|
| |

One of the helpful spirits during the making of this gown was, without doubt, Miss.
Starkie.
You want to know who Ms. Starkie is, or rather, was?
In 1597 the three children of a gentleman named Starkie living in Lancashire were possessed of
the devil and made accusations of witchcraft.
The eldest girl, aged fourteen, screamed and yelled to her possessing demon:
Come my lad.
Come on and set my partlet on one side as I do on the other...
Thus, my lad, I will have a fine Smocke of silke, it shall be finer than thine,
I will have a petticoat of silke, not redde but of the finest silk that is, it shall be
guarded and a foote high: It shall be laid out with gold lace;
it shall have a french bodie, not of whalebone, for that is not stiff enough, but of horne for
that will hold it out, it shall come, to keepe in my belly...
My lad I will have a busk of Whalebone, it shall be tyed with two silke Points,
and I will have a drawn wrought stomacher imbroidered with golde, finer than thine.
My lad, I will have a French farthingale, and it shall be finer than thine;
I will have it low before and high behind and broad on either side that I may laye mine arms
upon it.(pieced
together from Janet Arnold's "Queen Elizabeth's wardrobe unlock'd";
the original text -according to Mrs. Arnold- was by G. B. Harrison, Elizabethan Journal,
quoted in E. Sitwell, "The Queens and the Hive" (1966 ed.) p. 471.
If anyone should have either of those books, which I don't - I would be incredibly thankful
for the full version, which I doubt the above mentioned is) |
Now - in my humble and not really relevant opinion I think that:
-
Mr. Starkie should have given his daughter either more pocket money or better
clothes;
-
The young Miss Starkie was not possessed by the devil, but had a surprisingly vast
knowledge about fine clothing and materials (show me any modern 15-years-old teenager who can tell
various weaves and materials apart, if the whole family is not obsessed with sewing);
-
The 'spirit' she is possessed by is obviously female, as Miss Starkie compares the
clothing ("mine shall be finer than thine"). However - and please forgive if I make a mistake
here, English is not my first language - I have never heard anyone calling a female person "My
lad". I wonder if this is a transcript error and should have been "My lady" or what else may be
the reason for this.
I find these notes incredibly fascinating and sad and today one can only guess
vaguely what was behind this attitude, because frankly, the least thing I believe is that the three
children indeed were possessed by a spirit, let alone the devil.
Did the father want his daughter to go to a ball wearing an old dress? Did he make
his children wear old clothes? I guess we will never know; but it's very interesting reading what a
young girl of fourteen years seems to have found absolutely fashionable in 1597.
While making the Pelican gown reproduction I have often thought about young Miss
Starkie - you will find excerpts of the above written text in many places of the Pelican dress
diary.
I wonder what became of her. I would so like to know her name.
If reading such a text we should not only think of - in this case - Miss Starkie, but also of the
person who wrote this down. What might that person have thought about young Miss Starkie? Did he
know what she was talking about? Because, let's face it - today many man don't know too much about
women's clothing... Did he care for her? Or mindlessly kept the journal, without thinking about what
he was writing there?
I often think of Miss Starkie, and hope she one day got her fine garb that she
obviously so wished for. Ever since I read this, I sometimes feel strange when I find myself
studying a painting, when all my senses are focused on things like seams and decoration.
Then I start to think about the person that was actually portrayed and ask myself what they would
have thought if they had known that one day some people would only look at their images in order to
study the clothing instead of remembering the person.
And here we get to a point where costuming mixes with psychology. What was my
psychological idea behind making the Pelican gown? Did I really just make it for the sake of the
gown or did I wish to be like Queen Elizabeth? I can truly and honestly say that I don't know the
answer. Though I can say that I would never introduce myself with "Queen Elizabeth" when I wear this
gown, but with my own name.
One thing that she and I definitely have in common is that we both like sweets and
therefore our teeth suffer considerably; but I am incredibly thankful that I am living in times of
modern dentists - a grace that was never given to her.
I often thought if she spent her last days standing, never lying down, with her thumb in the mouth
(which she actually did - three days, if I remember correctly, and it is said that people thought
she "wanted to betray death" by not lying down to die) because she was perhaps in great pain coming
from the, uhm, remnants of her teeth so that she couldn't sleep, and finally died from exhaustion.
*This* is most definitely a situation I would never want to find myself in.
And this is also the reason why I *love* the fashion and lifestyle of Elizabethan times but would
never actually like to live in those times, because I would not want to live without the modern
inventions, like dentists, modern doctors in general and drugs, cars, other means of transportation
like trains, central heating etc. - plus, what would I do without my sewing- and embroidery machine
(sew and embroider by hand, I know - silly question)?
It's nice to dream of a life in Elizabethan times, but actually living there (and then) must have
been like hell. Well, perhaps I'm just a spoiled modern brat.
Many other things separate Elizabeth and me, but that might also be because she and
I live in different times. There are also things that I envy her for - she (right besides Nicole
Kidman, by the way) is the only red-haired woman I have ever seen who could wear red-colored
clothing without looking like a total freak, for example. I would never envy her for the power she
had, or for her possessions, though.
I could write down many, many more things. But perhaps I gave you a point to start
from with your own thinking when it comes to the period you would like to portrait if you put on
your costume the next time... If so, I have at least achieved one goal: You have started thinking
because of me. And thinking is never a bad thing.
And if you would like to discuss Miss Starkie's case - I'm most willing; my email
address is at the bottom of each page.
May you be possessed by good spirits 
Best wishes,
Naergi
And now you have the chance to own a sleeveband, very likely to the one I have shown
on the "sleeveband" page. Please follow me...
|